Anthropic, which began in 2021, was founded by some people who used to work at OpenAI, including Dario Amodei. Their main goal is to make AI systems that are not only smart but also safe and easy to understand. While both organizations work with AI, they have different ideas about how to use it best and keep it safe. In this blog post, we’ll explore the key features of OpenAI vs Anthropic to see how they stack up against each other.
What is Anthropic?
Anthropic is a new AI company from San Francisco, started in 2021 by people who used to work at OpenAI. They are experts in AI and are now focusing on making AI that is safe and trustworthy.
What makes Anthropic special is their strong focus on AI safety. They are committed to building AI systems that are safe, reliable, and easy to understand. They believe it’s important to know how these systems work on the inside to make sure they do what they are supposed to and don’t cause unexpected problems.
OpenAI vs Anthropic Features
OpenAI and Anthropic stand out as two major players, each with its own unique approach and features.
| Feature/Aspect | OpenAI | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | Leading AI research organization | AI startup focused on safety |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Founders | AI experts (including Elon Musk, Sam Altman) | Former OpenAI members (including Dario Amodei) |
| Mission | Ensure AGI benefits all of humanity | Create safe, reliable, and interpretable AI |
| Key Projects | GPT series, DALL-E, Codex | Focus on AI safety and reliability projects, including the Claude series |
| Focus Areas | Cutting-edge AI research, practical applications, responsible AI usage | AI safety research, system reliability, interpretable AI |
| Approach | Balances innovation and safety, develops a wide range of AI technologies | Prioritizes understanding and controlling AI behavior to mitigate risks |
| Public Recognition | High, due to projects like GPT and DALL-E | Rapidly gaining respect for its focus on AI safety |
OpenAI vs Anthropic Pricings Comparison
OpenAI and Anthropic, two of the most influential organizations in AI development, offer different pricing models that reflect their unique approaches to AI technology. Here’s a breakdown of their pricing plans.
| Feature | OpenAI (GPT-4 Turbo) | Anthropic (Claude 2) | Anthropic (Claude Instant) | Anthropic (Claude Opus) | Anthropic (Claude Sonnet) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | GPT-4 Turbo | Claude 2 | Claude Instant | Claude Opus | Claude Sonnet |
| Input Tokens | $0.03 per 1,000 | $11.02 per million | N/A | $15 per million | $3 per million |
| Output Tokens | $0.06 per 1,000 | $11.02 per million | $1.63 per million | $75 per million | $15 per million |
OpenAI vs Anthropic valuation
The valuation of companies like OpenAI and Anthropic reflects their influence, market potential, and the growing importance of AI technology. Here’s a closer look at how these two AI powerhouses compare in terms of valuation.
| Feature | OpenAI | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Current Valuation |
$80 billion (2024)
|
~$18.4 billion (2024) |
| Key Growth Drivers | – Cutting-edge AI models – Strategic partnerships (e.g., Microsoft) – Broad industry impact |
– Focus on AI safety – Founded by ex-OpenAI members – Targeted innovation in responsible AI |
| Market Position | Leading innovator in AI | Emerging leader in AI safety and reliability |
When to choose which
This chart provides a quick reference to help determine which platform to choose based on specific needs.
| Scenario | Choose OpenAI | Choose Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced AI Models | Requires cutting-edge models (GPT-4, DALL-E) | Prioritizes safety and interpretability |
| Flexible Pricing | Prefers pay-as-you-go model | Seeks predictable monthly costs |
| Enterprise Solutions | Needs customizable solutions with dedicated support | Wants team collaboration with strong safety focus |
| Focus on AI Safety | Interested in advanced AI but with some safety features | Prioritizes rigorous safety and ethical AI practices |
| Innovative Applications | Developing cutting-edge apps (assistants, tools) | Requires innovative yet reliable AI systems |
Conclusion
OpenAI and Anthropic represent two leading forces in the AI landscape, each with its own strengths and focus. OpenAI excels in versatility and has a broader market reach, while Anthropic prioritizes safety and interpretability.
The optimal choice between the two depends on specific project requirements. If you prioritize a wide range of capabilities and a large user community, OpenAI might be the preferred option. However, if safety and understanding the AI model’s decision-making process are paramount, Anthropic could be a better fit.
People Ask Questions
Is Anthropic better than OpenAI?
Both companies excel in different areas. Anthropic focuses on AI safety, while OpenAI is known for its versatile models. The “better” choice depends on your specific needs.
Is Anthropic the same as ChatGPT?
No, Anthropic is a company, while ChatGPT is a specific AI model developed by OpenAI.
Who is the CEO of Anthropic?
Dario Amodei is the CEO of Anthropic.
Why did Anthropic leave OpenAI?
Several key figures from OpenAI, including John Schulman and Dario Amodei, left to form Anthropic. The primary reason for their departure was a desire to focus more deeply on AI alignment and safety. John Schulman, for instance, mentioned that he wanted to engage in more hands-on technical work related to AI alignment. Dario Amodei also expressed a desire to build more trusted and reliable AI models.
Who is the father of OpenAI?
The primary founders of OpenAI are Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, Wojciech Zaremba, and John Schulman.
Has Elon Musk founded OpenAI?
Musk was an early investor in OpenAI, which was founded as a nonprofit in December 2015.
Who is the top scientist in OpenAI?
Determining a single “top scientist” is subjective, but prominent figures at OpenAI include Ilya Sutskever and Sam Altman.